Mind
Reading Your Mood Through Art: What Looking at Pictures Can and Cannot Tell You
Updated 2026-10-06 · Nadapge editorial team
The same painting can look peaceful one day and lonely the next. The painting has not changed; you have. Nadapge’s art reflection uses that simple fact as a way to notice how you are feeling right now. Before you try it, here is what picture-based reflection can tell you, and what it cannot.
Art therapy: what it is and what we know
Art therapy is a form of psychotherapy in which people make art with a trained therapist as a way to express and work through feelings. Its appeal is that color and form can carry emotions that are hard to put into words.
The research base is still growing. A UK systematic review found studies reporting positive effects of art therapy on some outcomes, but also noted that the studies were few and of mixed quality, so firmer conclusions need more research (Uttley et al., 2015). Just as important: art therapy happens within a relationship with a therapist. Looking at pictures on a website and choosing one is not art therapy, and we do not present it that way.
The emotions art evokes
Standing before a picture, we can feel admiration, awe, being moved, and sometimes discomfort or confusion. Researchers call these aesthetic emotions. Winfried Menninghaus and colleagues proposed that aesthetic emotions always carry an evaluation of how beautiful or striking something is, and that they shape how much we end up liking it (Menninghaus et al., 2019). That is why a sad painting can stay with you for a long time: uncomfortable feelings can deepen the experience rather than spoil it.
Mood colors what you see
Psychologist Gordon Bower reviewed evidence that mood influences memory and judgment (Bower, 1981). In a good mood, pleasant memories come to mind more easily; in a low mood, sad ones do. This is known as mood congruence.
Something similar can happen with art. On a heavy day, the dark tones or a solitary figure may catch your eye first; on a calm day, you might notice the light or the open space. Which picture draws you, and what you notice first, can therefore be a useful clue to your current mood.
Personality and taste in art
Researchers have also looked at how personality relates to art preferences:
- In a large UK sample, people higher in openness tended to like a wider range of styles, including less conventional ones such as abstract art and cubism (Chamorro-Premuzic et al., 2009).
- Adrian Furnham and John Walker likewise found that personality traits and previous experience with art were related to which paintings people preferred (Furnham & Walker, 2001).
These relationships are modest. You cannot conclude “she likes abstract art, so she must be very open.” Art education, past exposure, and the mood of the day all shape taste too.
Rating feelings with pictures: the SAM
When emotions are hard to put into words, a picture-based scale can help. Margaret Bradley and Peter Lang described the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), a set of simple figures used to rate three aspects of feeling (Bradley & Lang, 1994):
| Dimension | How the figure changes | What it asks |
|---|---|---|
| Pleasure | From frowning to smiling | How pleasant or unpleasant do you feel? |
| Arousal | From calm to excited | How calm or stirred up do you feel? |
| Dominance | From small to large | How much in control of the situation do you feel? |
Because it needs no words, the SAM is easy to use across ages and languages.
How Nadapge scores “Your mind through paintings”
You see 24 paintings (12 in the quick version), evenly split into warm scenes, ambiguous scenes with people, and intense or lonely scenes. Titles are revealed only at the end so they do not sway your feelings. For each painting we ask three things:
- What do you feel? Up to three of: joy, calm, excitement, tenderness, curiosity, longing, sadness, loneliness, anxiety, fear, irritation, numbness.
- How strong is it? Slightly, moderately, strongly.
- One more, depending on the scene: for ambiguous scenes, “what happens next”; for intense scenes, “what would you do first if you were there”; for warm scenes, “what draws you most”.
Results follow fixed rules, so the same answers always give the same result.
| Result | How it is computed | Research background |
|---|---|---|
| Colors of your mind | Feelings weighted by intensity; the top three | Mood-congruent processing (Bower, 1981) |
| Emotional balance | (positive minus negative) divided by total; 0.35 or more leans bright, -0.15 or less leans heavy | Affect balance research |
| Reading ambiguous scenes | Share of negative “what next” choices; 0.5 or more means a worried reading lately | Interpretation bias in depression and anxiety (Everaert et al., 2017; Hirsch et al., 2016) |
| Response to warm scenes | Share of warm scenes that evoked positive feelings; below 0.5 can signal fatigue | Blunted positive reactivity in depression (Bylsma et al., 2008) |
| Coping style | What you would do first in intense scenes (connect, solve, step back, accept, express) | Emotion-regulation meta-analysis (Aldao et al., 2010) |
| What you need | What draws you in warm scenes (connection, rest, freedom, mastery, meaning) | Self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) |
The research describes group-level tendencies. There are no published norms for these particular paintings, so these results are marked grade C. A heavier result is not a diagnosis; treat it as a reason to check in with yourself.
Why this is not a projective test
You may have seen claims like “If you chose this picture, you are hiding an old wound.” Projective tests, which aim to uncover hidden personality or problems from responses to ambiguous images, have been criticized in a major scientific review: for many commonly used scoring approaches, reliability and validity were weak or unsupported (Lilienfeld et al., 2000).
So Nadapge never treats your picture choices as evidence for a diagnosis. The pictures are prompts for naming your feelings and thinking about why. Here is the difference:
- Diagnostic interpretation: someone else decides what your choice “means.” You are not the owner of the interpretation.
- Reflective use: you ask yourself, “Why did this picture pull me in today?” and answer in your own words, accepting that the reasons may differ from person to person and from day to day.
In reflective use there are no wrong answers. If a picture brings up a memory or thought that helps you understand yourself a little better, that is enough.
How to use this
- On a day when your mind feels crowded, look slowly at a few pictures and pick the one that draws you most.
- Write one word for the first thing you noticed in it.
- Use the SAM to rate your current pleasure, arousal, and sense of control.
- In one or two sentences, write why you think this picture appealed to you today. There is no right answer.
- Look at the same picture a week later and notice how your response has changed.
Try picture-based reflection in art and mood, and for a broader look at how you are doing, use the mind check-in.
References
- Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59. doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 501-516.
- Furnham, A., & Walker, J. (2001). The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 997-1017.
- Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). What are aesthetic emotions? Psychological Review, 126(2), 171-195. doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135
- Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27-66. doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.002
- Uttley, L., Scope, A., Stevenson, M., Rawdin, A., Taylor Buck, E., Sutton, A., Stevens, J., Kaltenthaler, E., Dent-Brown, K., & Wood, C. (2015). Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders. Health Technology Assessment, 19(18).
- Everaert, J., Podina, I. R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2017). A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 58, 33-48.
- Hirsch, C. R., Meeten, F., Krahé, C., & Reeder, C. (2016). Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 281-305.
- Bylsma, L. M., Morris, B. H., & Rottenberg, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 676-691.
- Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217-237.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
This article is general information and does not replace medical or psychological diagnosis or treatment.